--- Day changed Tue Oct 21 2014
00:48 * sulix has a lot of writing to do tommorrow.
00:48 < sulix> By which I mean today.
+09:02 * sulix ->sainity--
+09:30 < Pommers> Morning
+11:07 < matches> :(
+11:11 * sulix has engaged "panic mode"
+11:12 < Pommers> Can you try and shake it off? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfWlot6h_JM
+11:12 < sulix> Also "holy shit, I don't have any results other than SIGSEGV" mode.
+11:20 < matches> I wish I hadn't read the comments on that video
+11:24 < matches> I'm having trouble understanding the metaphor
+11:24 < matches> Is Taylor Swift meant to be the thesis or me
+11:25 < matches> And how is the illuminati involved
+11:28 < Pommers> Never read YT comments
+11:28 < Pommers> Metaphor? Th[4~esis? Illuminati?
+11:34 < matches> "Haters gonna hate" would be me hating the thesis, but the thesis being an inanimate and currently purely digital object would be unable to shake itself
+11:35 < matches> According to the comments Taylor Swift is in the illuminati
+11:35 < sulix> The only shaking I can imagine is the solemn shaking of heads.
+11:35 < matches> :(
+11:35 < Pommers> Or
+11:36 < Pommers> Does your thesis hatre you, hence it's not happening
+11:36 < Pommers> and therefore you need to shake it off?
+11:36 < matches> Perhaps the clue is in the name, in that we need to Swiftly apply Taylor series to things
+11:38 < sulix> matches: That is the only consistent interpretation.
+11:38 < matches> I regret catching up on 6 weeks of lectures instead of working on the thesis
+11:40 < matches> http://www.irregularwebcomic.net/374.html
+11:40 < sulix> http://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1749
+11:42 < matches> Back to it I guess
+11:42 < matches> By which I mean back to spending 30 minutes mentally preparing myself to go back to it
+11:43 < Pommers> While you relax
+11:43 < Pommers> You could fix NTP on your laptop
+11:46 < sulix> better still, set the time to three days ago so that you have more time to work on the thesis.
+11:47 < Pommers> Thats's a good idea! Just avoid anything that relies on time
+11:49 < sulix> The number of sudden thoughts about much better ways to do this project is slightly terrifying.
+12:44 < sulix> /me suspects he's deleted more than he's written.
+13:02 < sulix> Someone's looked at quadtrees for "infinite bitmaps": http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/104609/infinite-bitmap
+13:44 < sulix> Knuth apparently does not like the term "mantissa". He has quite a rant about it and now I'm feeling guilty for using it.
+13:47 < matches> Let's face it, Knuth won't read our work, and if he does, he won't like it
+13:48 < sulix> I had a nightmare where Kahan was berating me for not understanding floats.
+13:49 < matches> You don't even need to write about floats? Do you?
+13:49 < matches> Also, should I be urgently producing graphs of how slow rationals are
+13:50 < matches> I have 6662 words, but this is really not good
+13:51 < sulix> I'm sort-of leaving the "results" section blank at the moment.
+13:51 < matches> Wait but what else do you need?
+13:51 < matches> Lit Review should be done*
+13:52 < matches> There is a "Methods" chapter which I'm a bit embarressed about
+13:52 < sulix> Also, I should push the "speed up everything because it was dodgy renderrange code that was taking >90% the time" fix at some point.
+13:52 < matches> How badly would pulling break everything...
+13:52 < sulix> I've been writing up how the quadtree works, and fixing up the lit review, intro, gpu float bits, etc.
+13:53 < sulix> Well, I don't think I've been brave enough to push yet, but probably it will break everything.
+13:53 < sulix> Though, with some small amount of luck, it should still compile.
+13:56 * sulix has pushed. Time to warm up your "git revert" commands.
+13:57 < sulix> Also I need to write up about how rationals can represent more things than the quadtree, which can only represent binary fractions.
+14:18 < matches> "A naive approach would be to simply replace all floating point operations with arbitrary precision operations, and this is in fact what we did before we realised how stupid that was"
+14:21 < sulix> I was going for "A naïve approach would be to simply replace all floating point operations with arbitrary precision operations, and unlike the quatreethulu, that does actually work."
+14:21 < matches> How do you get the ï in LaTeX
+14:22 < sulix> \"i
+14:22 < matches> Thankyou
+14:25 < matches> Is there a good reference I can cite for how shaders work...
+14:25 < matches> I really don't want to or have the space to explain the OpenGL API
+14:25 < sulix> The OpenGL spec?
+14:25 < matches> I guess
+14:25 < sulix> Or ARB_vertex_program / ARB_shader_program
+14:25 < sulix> s/shader_program/fragment_program
+14:47 < matches> You know I am linking to the git repository in my report
+14:47 < matches> The one with all the "My eyes, they burn!" commit messages...
+14:48 < matches> I figured that the markers assuming there wasn't version control was marginally worse than them reading my commit messages
+14:48 < matches> But only marginally
+14:49 * sulix wipes some nervous sweat from his brow.
+14:50 < Pommers> What did you do for commit messages?
+14:50 < matches> Usually stuff to the effect of "This code is awful"
+14:50 < matches> "I didn't even design this!"
+14:50 < matches> Etc
+14:51 < sulix> Pommers: cover your eyes: http://git.ucc.asn.au/?p=ipdf/code.git;a=shortlog
+14:52 < sulix> My favourite is "A Song of Floodfills and Segfaults"
+14:52 < Pommers> haha
+15:11 < sulix> matches: Any idea why "bezier.h:61:20: error: call of overloaded ‘Abs(Gmprat)’ is ambiguous"
+15:13 < sulix> Also: "rect.h:21:13: error: no match for ‘operator<<’ (operand types are ‘std::basic_ostream<char>’ and ‘const IPDF::Rational<IPDF::Arbint>’)" if I try Rational<T>
+15:37 < matches> Aaaah
+15:37 < matches> It wasn't ambiguous when I last used it!
+16:03 * sulix squirms nervously.
+16:06 < matches> I finally made the performance test graphs
+16:06 < matches> They are kind of dodgy
+16:07 < sulix> Ooh... show me.
+16:13 < matches> http://szmoore.net/ipdf/sam/figures/time.pdf
+16:13 < matches> http://szmoore.net/ipdf/sam/figures/memory.pdf
+16:13 < matches> It's using eye_of_the_rabbit.script
+16:14 < matches> It keeps track of how much memory is used for the View width
+16:14 < matches> And how long it takes to do each cycle that involves adding 3 rabbits seperated by 1e-3 or whatever it was
+16:14 < matches> A totally arbitrary test but hey, the graph is linear
+16:15 < matches> I'm pretty fed up with this project at this point
+16:15 < matches> Words are on the page
+16:16 < matches> It's amazing how much less you have to write when you remove the "TODO: I really should explain this properly"
+16:19 < sulix> Those are with the Gmprat for path bounds, doubles? for beziers?
+16:21 < matches> Gmprat for path bounds
+16:21 < matches> Not really much point doing it for anything else
+16:21 < matches> Since anything else won't render the images correctly
+16:21 < matches> I guess I should do it for doubles as well
+16:22 < matches> Actually doubles would be able to render that particular script correctly
+16:22 < matches> For a long time
+16:23 < sulix> The quadtree can render it correctly until there is more than one rabbit.
+16:23 < sulix> Also eye_of_the_rabbit is cpu rendered by default, no?
+16:24 < matches> Yeah I changed it to make that test
+16:24 < sulix> Okay.
+16:24 < matches> I'll run it for mpfr-1024 path
+16:24 < matches> I've had enough of having to tweak things to recompile the software...
+16:25 < matches> So I'm limited to the binaries I already have and they have a habit of sigfpe'ing
+16:26 < matches> Oh, it was also done with the window hidden
+16:26 < sulix> By choice or by fglrx?
+16:26 < matches> By choice
+16:31 < matches> Urgh this project is dumb
+16:31 < matches> I really don't want to have to repeat my final year project :S
+17:17 < matches> How do you like being referred to as "Gow"
+17:17 < matches> Also it's been an hour or so without me saying this project is silly
+17:17 < matches> So I'll say it again
+17:18 < matches> I ended up putting the Circles on CPU/GPU in my "Lit Review" part...
+17:18 < matches> Because it just fit a lot better underneath the section that was actually talking about it
+17:18 < matches> Rather than in the results
+17:19 < matches> "By the way we did some circles too"
+17:19 < matches> I feel like I should say something snarky about the naive method not being worthy of publication...
+17:19 < matches> That might be a bad idea
+17:29 < matches> "Hi all, No doubt you are busy preparing your final report..."
+17:29 < matches> AAAAAHHH
+17:30 < matches> I don't know, there's only so much you can polish a turd..
+17:30 < matches> Holy shit how do I have 40 references
+17:30 < matches> I guess there was that "Look I read about GPUs [10 references]" paragraph
+17:31 < matches> Should I mention the arbitrary precision on GPU stuff
+17:31 < matches> Blargh
+17:41 < matches> "The main body of the report should be between 6,000 and 8,000
+17:41 < matches> words excluding appendices. (i.e. from the beginning of the
+17:41 < matches> Introduction to the end of the Conclusions/Future work section)."
+17:41 < matches> Finally found the word limit
+17:41 < matches> Dammit
+17:41 < matches> Here I was aiming for 6000 maximum...
+17:44 < matches> I can stick in the pointless sections about "Pixels or Perish" I guess
+17:44 < matches> Distract them with pretty pictures
+17:47 < matches> Takes me up to 46 references...
+17:47 < matches> And 6972 words
+17:47 < matches> Done
+17:48 < matches> Submit
+18:21 < sulix> I think your thesis is significantly better than mine.
+18:22 < sulix> Mostly because it has more results and less "TODO"
+18:26 * sulix seeps into a 20 minute come.
+18:26 < sulix> s/come/coma
+18:26 < sulix> (The state of my brain is becoming more and more evident)
+18:55 < matches> (The trick is to delete the TODOs)
+--- Day changed Wed Oct 22 2014
+12:50 < matches> ECM sent me an email about 2015 Final Year Project preferences...
+12:50 < matches> NO
+12:50 < matches> I already did this!
+12:50 < matches> They also sent me an email about submitting vacation work reports
+12:50 < matches> I didn't do that yet!
+12:51 < matches> This is what you get for totally ignoring the recommended degree progression
+17:17 < Pommers> Guess who has card access through the main door for CS xD
+17:18 * sulix is filled with a jealous rage.
+17:20 < Pommers> hehehehe
+17:20 < Pommers> Pretty sure I now have more Access to CS than both of you :D
+17:54 < matches> They'll probably be glad they get to revoke our access at the end of the year
+17:54 < matches> Doing other assignments is a nice distraction from the project although in terms of time investment it is not wise
+17:54 < matches> In terms of time investment the correct approach is to fail everything else
+17:55 < matches> Although that didn't work so well last semester
+17:55 < matches> (I didn't actually fail but my marks got consistently lower :(
+17:55 < matches> I don't know how to bracket that
+17:55 < matches> :()
+--- Day changed Thu Oct 23 2014
+18:12 < matches> My report scores a Flesch Reading Ease of 42.30
+18:12 < matches> Which is higher than "university graduate" and lower than "13 to 15 year old students"
+18:13 < matches> It scores a Flesch-Kincaid Grade of 12.44
+18:13 < matches> I guess that means it is high school level...
+18:13 < matches> That isn't as reassuring as I'd hoped...
+18:14 < matches> At least I'm beating "an average 6th grade assignment"
+18:17 < matches> My physics thesis is 39.90 and 12.99 indicating my writing has gotten dumber, as expected
+18:19 < matches> Yours is at 46.06 and 11.39
+18:19 < matches> The question is, what should we be aiming for...
+18:21 < matches> That was an interesting but not particularly productive diversion into readability of documents
+18:21 < matches> (I think the most this test can conclusively say is that we did indeed write some words)
+18:21 < matches> (Many of which had more than one syllable)
+19:40 * sulix shall have words with "an arbitrary number of syllables" in his thesis.
+19:41 < sulix> Also, it turns out printperf has a big #ifdef QUADTREE_DISABLED around it.
+19:41 < sulix> Which explains much.
+19:59 < sulix> Did you know: when rendering with GMPrat, sometimes the debug text displays the bounds as being totally wrong for a frame, and then they're back to normal.
+20:00 * sulix has found something even more fun than watching paint dry: watching gmprat render.
+20:16 * sulix now has a graph: http://davidgow.net/stuff/ipdf-gmpqttest1.pdf
+20:54 < matches> Cool
+21:16 < matches> That looks very similar to the turtles graph I just got
+21:16 < matches> Except qtree isn't on it
+21:16 < matches> Path-gmprat is my favourite
+21:29 < matches> Ok, I know it's only 9:28 but my clock says 5:28
+21:29 < matches> So that counts as bed time
+21:30 * matches tries not to think about the asignment due tomorrow or the 3 weeks of assignments that need to be marked before students start to hate me
+21:30 < matches> Or, for that matter, how he is going to explain Quantum Mechanics...
+21:31 < matches> Or CoderDojo...
+21:31 < matches> I must be getting old
+21:31 < matches> Back in 2012 I could work on my thesis until 5am and still be awake enough to do my other assignments :S
+21:32 < matches> That might be a slight exagerration, I think there was a large amount of feeling like death involved
+21:36 < matches> I used to know the quantum number selection rules off by heart too...
+21:41 < matches> Ahh, the amazing HTML formatting of the quantum mechanics webpage
+21:41 < matches> The memories
+--- Day changed Sat Oct 25 2014
+11:26 * sulix will not be able to make coderdojo today, for obvious reasons.
+11:26 < matches> Ok, good luck
+17:39 -!- sulix [
[email protected]] has quit [Quit: So long and thanks for all the ghoti]
+--- Log opened Sun Oct 26 14:54:49 2014
+14:54 -!- Irssi: #ipdf: Total of 4 nicks [1 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 3 normal]
+14:54 -!- Irssi: Join to #ipdf was synced in 3 secs
+14:55 < matches> Very much in the "The referencing doesn't produce ?? submit it" phase
+14:57 < matches> Ah crap the referencing still produces ??
+14:57 < matches> But only in the appendix...
+15:50 < matches> I get to submit this to a "Printerface"
+15:50 < matches> Oh ho ho
+15:53 * sulix has had the joy of having to redo his data with vblank off.
+15:54 < sulix> Also, the random flickering bug is actually showing up in the graphs
+16:02 < matches> Yuk
+16:03 < matches> So you have loads of data now though?
+16:03 < matches> I had vague plans of redoing graphs and then apathy happened
+16:03 < sulix> Yeah, lots and lots of graphs and numbers.
+16:03 < matches> Cool
+16:04 < matches> I just have like, 3...
+16:04 < sulix> I extended the profiler to also output the number of objects in the document and rendered
+16:04 < sulix> (Well, I only have 3 interesting graphs)
+16:05 < sulix> The quadtree spens 23.7% of its time generating new nodes.
+16:05 < sulix> (In case you cared)
+16:05 < matches> Only 23.7%?
+16:05 < sulix> Yup.
+16:06 < sulix> It generates at total (during the zoom-in-on-grid test for 800 frames) of 219 nodes.
+16:06 < sulix> And clips a total of 6559 objects
+16:07 < matches> I'll email what I have.
+16:07 < matches> Prepare to be whelmed.
+16:07 < matches> Oh dear I just quoted *that* movie
+16:09 < sulix> I'll email mine when I've finished regenerating all of the graphs and stats with non-vblanked data.
+16:10 < sulix> (The quadtree is now officially 2127 times faster than naïve use of GMP rationals)
+16:12 < matches> I think naive use of GMP rationals is a slightly unfair benchmark... :P
+16:12 < matches> But it'll make for impressive graphs
+16:12 < sulix> The requested URL /sam/ipdf/thesis.pdf was not found on this server.
+16:13 < matches> /ipdf/sam/thesis.pdf
+16:13 < matches> Also attached it to the email
+16:13 -!- Irssi: #ipdf: Total of 4 nicks [1 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 3 normal]
+16:13 < sulix> Also, "Wintrhop Professor".
+16:13 < matches> Oh boy
+16:14 < matches> Wait where does it even say that...
+16:14 < matches> Oh
+16:14 < matches> The damn letter
+16:19 < matches> Yeah going by the rubric I think I'll have a solid 1/4 average
+17:05 < sulix> Again, the closer this project is to being due, the more interesting mathematical things I'm finding that I wish I'd seen earlier.
+17:06 * sulix slips a small reference to the Riemann Zeta function into a footnote.
+17:23 < matches> I'm concerned about the lack of interesting mathematical things in my thesis, footnote or otherwise
+17:24 < matches> I think I'm allowed to call it a thesis since that's what I was supposed to put on the "letter"
+17:25 < matches> You can't diss this ertation
+17:25 < matches> That worked in my head
+17:25 < matches> synonyms..
+17:25 < matches> monograph
+17:26 < matches> disquisition
+17:26 < matches> disquietening
+17:26 < matches> composition
+17:26 <@bobgeorge33> When does Tim officailly start work again?
+17:26 < matches> in the key of F# minor
+17:26 < matches> Um
+17:26 < matches> Next year?
+17:27 < matches> Someone has to write a "supervisor report"
+17:29 < matches> Well, I at least have lots of words
+17:29 < matches> Too many to proof read
+18:07 < matches> It has been submitted to the Printer Face
+18:07 < matches> Good luck sulix
+18:10 * sulix solemnly nods: "Good luck to us all!"
+23:34 < sulix> It is done: http://davidgow.net/stuff/DavidFYPThesis.pdf
+23:38 <@bobgeorge33> When are they due?
+23:42 <@bobgeorge33> Lastly, as a double degree student I need to
+23:42 <@bobgeorge33> express a double degree of thanks to my friends and family for their continued patience whilst I
+23:42 <@bobgeorge33> completed my second “final year” project in what is technically a penultimate year.
+23:42 <@bobgeorge33> Very nice
+--- Day changed Mon Oct 27 2014
+08:46 < matches> They're due at 12:00pm
+09:00 < matches> Hmm, there are only a few highly wrong statements in my thesis
+09:01 < matches> To resubmit or not to resubmit
+09:03 < matches> I keep thinking I really need more detail and then I realise it's 9000 words...
+09:03 < matches> What did I even say in those 9000 words I don't even
+09:04 < matches> In other news it's 9:04 and no one is at my tutorial...
+09:05 < matches> I was going to show them CQM animations
+09:09 < matches> Curses a student
+09:09 < matches> (I don't know what I want)
+10:15 * sulix resubmits to fix the typo in the latin reference that Tim disconvered.
+10:16 < sulix> I've also added the original proposal as an Appendix because apparently I'm meant to, though it does sort-of highlight how little of it I've actually done.
+10:19 * sulix proceeds to collapse from exhaustion.
+10:44 -!- Netsplit mussel.ucc.au.uniirc.com <-> arctic.uniirc.com quits: @bobgeorge33
+10:45 -!- Netsplit over, joins: @bobgeorge33
+11:11 -!- Netsplit mussel.ucc.au.uniirc.com <-> arctic.uniirc.com quits: @bobgeorge33
+11:12 < matches> Aaaand
+11:12 < matches> LMS is being LMS
+11:13 -!- Netsplit over, joins: @bobgeorge33
+11:13 < matches> UWA is having problems?
+11:13 < matches> Trying to resubmit to Printer Face
+11:13 < matches> Not sure if I am now going to end up with two copies...
+11:14 < matches> The second copy is slightly less vague
+11:14 < matches> I guess people can work out that they need to read IEEE to get the full gory details of the encodings and stuff
+11:15 < matches> Also people can probably work out the legends on my graphs if they think
+11:15 < matches> Also there is like, wierd functional programming notation in Tim and Rowan's emails
+11:15 < matches> Is it a secret code?
+11:23 < matches> AAAH SHIT
+11:23 < matches> My last commit is going to be at 7:23pm
+11:23 < matches> I'll get in trouble for using a time machine to submit it before 12:00pm
+11:40 -!- Netsplit mussel.ucc.au.uniirc.com <-> arctic.uniirc.com quits: @bobgeorge33
+11:42 -!- Netsplit over, joins: @bobgeorge33
+11:42 < matches> Well, that as anticlimactic
+11:43 < matches> The whole having 3 other assignments due this week thing sort of ruins it
+11:51 -!- Netsplit mussel.ucc.au.uniirc.com <-> arctic.uniirc.com quits: @bobgeorge33
+11:51 -!- Netsplit over, joins: @bobgeorge33
+11:53 < matches> I actually really don't trust someone else to print my assignment :S
+11:53 < matches> Who is this Printer and why does it have a Face
+11:54 < matches> What if the inline postscript gets interpreted by the driver as actual postscript and it just prints 40 pages of shape.eps
+11:54 < matches> Aaaah
+11:56 <@bobgeorge33> What happens if it decides to print 100 copies instead of 1 and they aren't collated!
+11:59 * matches stabs
+12:01 < matches> sulix: "Programmme"
+12:01 < matches> Does it have three mmm like that
+12:01 < sulix> Um... it does now.
+12:02 < matches> I approve
+12:02 < sulix> I am a programmmmmmer
+12:03 -!- Netsplit mussel.ucc.au.uniirc.com <-> arctic.uniirc.com quits: @bobgeorge33
+18:38 -!- bobgeorge33 is now known as Pommers
+--- Day changed Thu Oct 30 2014
+13:45 < matches> sulix: Is there going to be a meeting about your presentation? Should I come, or stay away?
+14:16 < sulix> I don't think there's going to be a meeting... I've got another research project due at 4:00, so I'll be doing that.
+14:16 < sulix> The seminar schedule is out now, though: http://undergraduate.csse.uwa.edu.au/year4/Current/Project/seminarTimetable.html
+14:17 < sulix> It's hysterically empty.
+14:28 < matches> Baha
+14:29 < matches> 25 minutes, ew
+14:29 < matches> Good luck
+14:29 < sulix> You're welcome to come along to the talk if you hate sleep.
+14:29 < matches> I will try and come
+14:30 < matches> "Time travel debugging"...
+14:30 < sulix> Yeah, Ben's a genius.
+14:30 < matches> I do that all the time though
+14:30 < matches> (With printf statements)
+14:30 < sulix> But you live in the future.
+14:30 < matches> (And scrolling through the output with less)
+14:30 < matches> That too
+14:31 < matches> Don't worry, your abstract sounds really cool too
+--- Day changed Sat Nov 01 2014
+10:27 < matches> I guess we're done here, good job
+--- Day changed Tue Nov 04 2014
+14:30 < matches> We will leave this channel here until the marks come out
+--- Day changed Sat Nov 08 2014
+23:00 -!- Pommers is now known as bobgeorge33
+23:00 -!- bobgeorge33 is now known as Pommers
+--- Day changed Tue Nov 11 2014
+--- Day changed Wed Nov 12 2014
+--- Day changed Fri Nov 14 2014
+--- Day changed Sun Nov 30 2014
+12:08 < Pommers> When are marks due out?
+12:46 < matches> Well
+12:46 < matches> Other unit results are due on the 17th so I assume these are as well
+12:51 < matches> I will just continue to be thankful that my 2012 results are listed first on my academic record...
+13:26 < Pommers> Yes That is always the bust thing
+13:55 < matches> The best thing about those results is the totally vague unit names
+13:55 < matches> "Special Topics in Physics I, II, III and IV"
+--- Day changed Mon Dec 01 2014
+14:03 < sulix> Hmm... it looks like my project marks are on csmarks.
+15:20 < Pommers> fuck
+15:22 * Pommers loves scaling
+21:31 < matches> Oh dear
+21:32 < matches> Mine are not :S
+21:33 < Pommers> Don't fret
+21:34 < Pommers> Looks like they've pulled the marks now
+21:34 < matches> -_-
+21:34 < matches> But I wanted to know
+21:34 < Pommers> Wait. I'm just blind
+21:35 < matches> I could check LMS
+21:35 < matches> CSMarks evil step cousin
+21:35 < matches> It seems to just be a weekly "RETURN ANY KEYS BORROWED"
+21:36 < Pommers> LMS says I got 57% for the unit
+21:36 < Pommers> "equal 16th / 35 in cohort"
+21:36 < matches> ... I still have - out of 100% for the Semester 1 progress report
+21:36 < Pommers> The average was below my mark
+21:36 < Pommers> 14 people sitting on 0% though >.>
+21:36 < matches> That's wierd
+21:36 < matches> Scaling is wierd
+21:38 < Pommers> But i love it
+21:38 < matches> I wish the culture was "we will do an amazing job on the unit and its assessible content so that everyone gets a mark that is indicative of their knowledge" not just "screw it we'll scale everyone"
+21:38 < matches> But apparently apathy averages out better than diligence
+21:39 < matches> If lots of people got 0% that would make scaling do strange things
+21:39 < matches> How much magic do they do to make it a normal distribution
+21:40 < matches> Well I guess they just scale everyone who got more than 0% and it will maybe be normal
+21:41 < matches> Good luck anyway
+21:42 < matches> I suppose around December 17th I'll start to get nervous about my "0/300" score on LMS
+--- Day changed Thu Dec 11 2014
+19:28 < matches> :S
+19:29 < Pommers> Tis a boty
git.ucc.asn.au / ipdf / documents.git / blobdiff
UCC git Repository :: git.ucc.asn.au