\chapter{Literature Review}\label{Background}
-The first half of this chapter will be devoted to documents themselves, including: the representation and displaying of graphics primitives\cite{computergraphics2}, and how collections of these primitives are represented in document formats, focusing on widely used standards\cite{plrm, pdfref17, svg2011-1.1}.
+The first part of this chapter will be devoted to documents themselves, including: the representation and displaying of graphics primitives, and how collections of these primitives are represented in document formats, focusing on widely used standards.
We will find that although there has been a great deal of research into the rendering, storing, editing, manipulation, and extension of document formats, modern standards are content to specify at best single precision IEEE-754 floating point arithmetic.
-The research on arbitrary precision arithmetic applied to documents is rather sparse; however arbitrary precision arithmetic itself is a very active field of research. Therefore, the second half of this chapter will be devoted to considering fixed precision floating point numbers as specified by the IEEE-754 standard, possible limitations in precision, and alternative number representations for increased or arbitrary precision arithmetic.
+The research on arbitrary precision arithmetic applied to documents is rather sparse; however arbitrary precision arithmetic itself is a very active field of research. Therefore, remainder of this chapter will be devoted to considering fixed precision floating point numbers as specified by the IEEE-754 standard, possible limitations in precision, and alternative number representations for increased or arbitrary precision arithmetic.
In Chapter \ref{Progress}, we will discuss our findings so far with regards to arbitrary precision arithmetic applied to document formats, and expand upon the goals outlined in Chapture \ref{Proposal}.
Hearn and Baker's textbook ``Computer Graphics''\cite{computergraphics2} gives a comprehensive overview of graphics from physical display technologies through fundamental drawing algorithms to popular graphics APIs. This section will examine algorithms for drawing two dimensional geometric primitives on raster displays as discussed in ``Computer Graphics'' and the relevant literature. This section is by no means a comprehensive survey of the literature but intends to provide some idea of the computations which are required to render a document.
-It is of some historical significance that vector display devices were popular during the 70s and 80s, and papers oriented towards drawing on these devices can be found\cite{brassel1979analgorithm}. Whilst curves can be drawn at high resolution on vector displays, a major disadvantage was shading; by the early 90s the vast majority of computer displays were raster based\cite{computergraphics2}.
+It is of some historical significance that vector display devices were popular during the 70s and 80s, and papers oriented towards drawing on these devices can be found\cite{brassel1979analgorithm}. Whilst curves can be drawn at high resolution on vector displays, a major disadvantage was shading\cite{lane1983analgorithm}; by the early 90s the vast majority of computer displays were raster based\cite{computergraphics2}.
-\subsection{Straight Lines}\label{Rasterising Straight Lines}
+\subsection{Straight Lines}\label{Straight Lines}
\input{chapters/Background_Lines}
\subsection{Spline Curves and B{\'e}ziers}\label{Spline Curves}
-\section{Number Representations}
+\section{Number Representations}\label{Number Representations}
+Consider a value of $7.25 = 2^2 + 2^1 + 2^0 + 2^{-2}$. In binary (base 2), this could be written as $111.01_2$ Such a value would require 5 binary digits (bits) of memory to represent exactly in computer hardware. Some values, for example $7.3$ can not be represented exactly in one base (decimal) but not another; in binary the sequence $111.010\text{...}_2$ will never terminate. A rational value such as $\frac{7}{3}$ could not be represented exactly in any base, but could be represented by the combination of a numerator $7 = 111_2$ and denominator $3 = 11_2$. Lastly, some values such as $e \approx 2.81\text{...}$ can only be expressed exactly using a symbolical system --- in this case as the result of an infinite summation --- $e = \displaystyle\sum_n=0^{\infty} (-1)^{n}\frac{1}{n!}$
-Consider a value of $7.25 = 2^2 + 2^1 + 2^0 + 2^{-2}$. In binary, this can be written as $111.01_2$ Such a value would require 5 binary digits (bits) of memory to represent exactly. On the other hand a rational value such as $7\frac{1}{3}$ could not be represented exactly; the sequence of bits $111.0111 \text{ ...}_2$ never terminates. Modern computer hardware typically supports integer and floating-point number representations. Due to physical limitations, the size of these representations is limited; this is the fundamental source of both limits on range and precision in computer based calculations.
-
-A Fixed Point representation keeps the ``point'' at the same position in a string of bits. Floating point representations can be thought of as analogous to scientific notation; an ``exponent'' and fixed point value are encoded, with multiplication by the exponent moving the position of the point.
+Modern computer hardware typically supports integer and floating-point number representations and operations. Due to physical limitations, the size of these representations is limited; this is the fundamental source of both limits on range and precision in computer based calculations.
\subsection{Floating Point Definitions}
+Whilst a Fixed Point representation keeps the ``point'' at the same position in a string of bits, Floating point representations can be thought of as analogous to scientific notation; an ``exponent'' and fixed point value are encoded, with multiplication by the exponent moving the position of the point.
+
A floating point number $x$ is commonly represented by a tuple of values $(s, e, m)$ in base $B$ as\cite{HFP, ieee2008-754}:
\begin{align*}
Where $s$ is the sign and may be zero or one, $m$ is commonly called the ``mantissa'' and $e$ is the exponent. Whilst $e$ is an integer in some range $\pm e_max$, the mantissa $m$ is a fixed point value in the range $0 < m < B$.
-The choice of base $B = 2$ in the original IEEE-754 standard matches the nature of modern hardware. It has also been found that this base in general gives the smallest rounding errors\cite{HFP}. Early computers had in fact used a variety of representations including $B=3$ or even $B=7$\cite{goldman1991whatevery}, and the revised IEEE-754 standard specifies a decimal representation $B = 10$ intended for use in financial applications\cite{ieee754std2008}. From now on we will restrict ourselves to considering base 2 floats.
+The choice of base $B = 2$ in the original IEEE-754 standard matches the nature of modern hardware. It has also been found that this base in general gives the smallest rounding errors\cite{HFP}. Early computers had in fact used a variety of representations including $B=3$ or even $B=7$\cite{goldman1991whatevery}, and the revised IEEE-754 standard specifies a decimal representation $B = 10$ intended for use in financial applications\cite{ieee754std2008}\footnote{Eg: The smallest valid unit of currency \$0.01 could not be represented exactly in base 2}. From now on we will restrict ourselves to considering base 2 floats.
The IEEE-754 encoding of $s$, $e$ and $m$ requires a fixed number of continuous bits dedicated to each value. Originally two encodings were defined: binary32 and binary64. $s$ is always encoded in a single leading bit, whilst (8,23) and (11,53) bits are used for the (exponent, mantissa) encodings respectively.
-The encoding of $m$ in the IEEE-754 standard is not exactly equivelant to a fixed point value. By assuming an implicit leading bit (ie: restricting $1 \leq m < 2$) except for when $e = 0$, floating point values are gauranteed to have a unique representations; these representations are said to be ``normalised''. When $e = 0$ the leading bit is not implied; these representations are called ``denormals'' because multiple representations may map to the same real value. This idea, which allows for one extra bit of precision when using normalised values appears to have been considered by Goldberg as early as 1967\cite{goldbern1967twentyseven}.
+The encoding of $m$ in the IEEE-754 standard is not exactly equivelant to a fixed point value. By assuming an implicit leading bit (ie: restricting $1 \leq m < 2$) except for when $e = 0$, floating point values are gauranteed to have a unique representations; these representations are said to be ``normalised''. When $e = 0$ the leading bit is not implied; these representations are called ``denormals'' because multiple representations may map to the same real value. The idea of using an implicit bit appears to have been considered by Goldberg as early as 1967\cite{goldbern1967twentyseven}.
Figure \ref{float.pdf}\footnote{In a digital PDF viewer we suggest increasing the zoom level --- the graphs were created from SVG images} shows the positive real numbers which can be represented exactly by an 8 bit floating point number encoded in the IEEE-754 format\footnote{Not quite; we are ignoring the IEEE-754 definitions of NaN and Infinity for simplicity}, and the distance between successive floating point numbers. We show two encodings using (1,2,5) and (1,3,4) bits to encode (sign, exponent, mantissa) respectively. For each distinct value of the exponent, the successive floating point representations lie on a straight line with constant slope. As the exponent increases, larger values are represented, but the distance between successive values increases; this can be seen on the right. The marked single point discontinuity at \verb/0x10/ and \verb/0x20/ occur when $e$ leaves the denormalised region and the encoding of $m$ changes. We have also plotted a fixed point representation for comparison; fixed point and integer representations appear as straight lines - the distance between points is always constant.
-\subsection{Precision and Rounding}
+\subsection{Precision and Rounding}\label{Precision and Rounding}
Real values which cannot be represented exactly in a floating point representation must be rounded to the nearest floating point value. The results of a floating point operation will in general be such values and thus there is a rounding error possible in any floating point operation. Referring to Figure \ref{floats.pdf} it can be seen that the largest possible rounding error is half the distance between successive floats; this means that rounding errors increase as the value to be represented increases.
git.ucc.asn.au / ipdf / sam.git / blobdiff
UCC git Repository :: git.ucc.asn.au