X-Git-Url: https://git.ucc.asn.au/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=irc%2Flog;h=3b03edbb7c4d297ca82e82dbdcd33fcc24008317;hb=85a4ea3366eaf09950957e416a2e12c8e4270f92;hp=a523069fbeaa6e9d79f7d0568383bd11d159b753;hpb=8f709f98100ac142e8636b6fba0dcb9db7a3c994;p=matches%2FMCTX3420.git diff --git a/irc/log b/irc/log index a523069..3b03edb 100644 --- a/irc/log +++ b/irc/log @@ -4466,3 +4466,511 @@ 22:55 < jtanx> as I doubt I have the time to implement this 23:10 < jtanx> it would definitely add overhead too 23:40 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit ["ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 24.0/20130910160258]"] +--- Day changed Tue Oct 08 2013 +18:01 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +19:37 -!- MctxBot [~twang@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit [Ping timeout] +21:16 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit ["ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 24.0/20130910160258]"] +--- Day changed Wed Oct 09 2013 +08:29 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +09:20 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit [Ping timeout] +09:54 -!- MctxBot [~twang@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +10:52 -!- jtanx [~asfa@130.95.133.152] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +10:55 -!- jtanx_ [~asfa@130.95.54.13] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +10:56 < jtanx_> welp the usb microscope arrived +10:56 < jtanx_> it uses uvcvideo too +11:07 -!- jtanx [~asfa@130.95.133.152] has quit [Connection reset by peer] +12:00 < jtanx_> shit, we have to coordinate one report across the whole cohort +12:02 < sam_moore> Yeah, shit +12:03 < sam_moore> This unit has not been run very well +12:03 < sam_moore> Except the tutorials +12:06 < sam_moore> If I still cared I +12:06 < sam_moore> d try and take charge of putting the report together +12:07 < sam_moore> But I know that if no one else does it we'll all pass anyway since you can't fail an entire class +12:07 < sam_moore> So terrible +12:07 < sam_moore> We should just start writing a chapter on the software +12:09 < sam_moore> I wonder if we could use the wiki format and export it as a pdf somehow +12:11 < sam_moore> https://github.com/szmoore/MCTX3420/wiki/Hardware:-Pneumatics +12:11 < sam_moore> Hilarious +12:41 < jtanx_> ~.~ +12:41 < jtanx_> our final report will be the wiki! +12:42 < jtanx_> made some progress on the camera +12:42 < jtanx_> lowering the resolution to 352x288 +12:42 < jtanx_> and it will work with openc +12:42 < jtanx_> opencv +12:42 < jtanx_> ffmpeg's fine with 640x480 though +12:42 < jtanx_> opencv just sucks +12:57 < jtanx_> good 'ol stream.html +13:05 < jtanx_> those fatal checks in sensor.c are bad +13:05 < jtanx_> because half the time adc reads will fail and the whole program just crashes +13:07 < jtanx_> oh right I saw your email, nevermind +13:08 < jtanx_> I'm not getting the warnings that you're seeing either +13:12 < sam_moore> Yeah, those warnings were actually on my laptop though, they don't seem to appear on the BeagleBone +13:12 < sam_moore> I'm redoing the sensors code a fair bit +13:12 < sam_moore> You'll probably hate it :P +13:12 < sam_moore> Well, it's not really redoing the structure of how they work +13:13 < sam_moore> Just separating the logic of how sensors get read from all that control loop stuf +13:14 < sam_moore> I'm going to keep with the "one thread per sensor" idea, because that is definitely the simplest +13:16 < sam_moore> Did you tell Omid that they shouldn't assume anything about the state of the GPIO pins before the software starts? +13:16 < sam_moore> Which means that if (unlikely, but I don't know what they're doing) having two pins on at once would cause a catastrophic failure... +13:16 < sam_moore> By murphy's law, it will almost certainly happen +13:33 -!- jtanx_ [~asfa@130.95.54.13] has quit [Ping timeout] +13:59 -!- jtanx [~asfa@130.95.121.247] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +13:59 -!- jtanx [~asfa@130.95.121.247] has quit ["ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 24.0/20130910160258]"] +14:51 -!- jtanx [~asfa@130.95.248.194] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +14:52 < jtanx> oh yah, somehow electronics ordered a non-powered usb hub +14:52 < jtanx> I'm pretty sure we told them to get a powered usb hub... +14:57 < sam_moore> Yep, and I remember them saying that is what they were going to get +14:57 < sam_moore> Dammit, I'm stuck trying to pick the best name for something -_- +14:57 < sam_moore> The worst place to be stuck +15:19 < jtanx> ?? +15:19 < jtanx> thesaurus.com +15:23 < sam_moore> Hahaha +15:23 < sam_moore> I decided the thing didn't really need to exist +15:23 < sam_moore> Problem solved +15:24 < sam_moore> If someone who knows absolutely nothing about programming tries to add sensors to our program they will still be confused +15:24 < jtanx> Hahaha +15:24 < sam_moore> But I hope I've made it easier for someone who knows what they're doing +15:24 < jtanx> Okay +15:24 < jtanx> what were the compiler warnings that you got +15:25 < sam_moore> pin_test.c:41:10: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast] +15:25 < sam_moore> pin_test.c:48:10: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast] +15:25 < sam_moore> More on lines 54, 128, 190,204 +15:25 < jtanx> weird +15:25 < jtanx> I never saw any of those +15:25 < sam_moore> Also I think the code I just wrote for the Strain sensors gives some as well +15:25 < sam_moore> Yes, it does +15:26 < jtanx> did you change GPIO_Export to use int type +15:26 < jtanx> wait +15:26 < jtanx> what am I saying +15:26 < sam_moore> It already uses int type? +15:26 < sam_moore> But it's something like that +15:26 < sam_moore> It looks like you're using unsigned char for something +15:27 < sam_moore> int gpio_num = Strain_To_GPIO(id); +15:27 < sam_moore> GPIO_Export(gpio_num); +15:27 < sam_moore> Is the sort of thing that causes the warning +15:27 < sam_moore> But I have "bool GPIO_Export(int pin)" in bbb_pin.c +15:27 < jtanx> oh right +15:27 < sam_moore> So it makes no sense +15:28 < jtanx> hmm +15:29 < sam_moore> Ooh +15:29 < sam_moore> It must be something to do with the "stub" functions +15:29 < jtanx> Is this on compilation on the BBB +15:29 < sam_moore> No, BBB was fine last time I checked +15:29 < jtanx> okay,w ell I'm not getting any warnings +15:29 < sam_moore> Compiling on my laptop because it's faster +15:30 < sam_moore> #define GPIO_Export(pin) True_Stub((void*)pin) +15:30 < sam_moore> That means the int is getting cast to a void* +15:30 < jtanx> yeah on my computer it's not putting out any warnings +15:30 < jtanx> int to void* is fine +15:30 < jtanx> anything to void* is fine +15:30 < jtanx> actually +15:30 < jtanx> is your system 64 bit +15:30 < sam_moore> 64 bit +15:31 < jtanx> yeah +15:31 < sam_moore> (You still have 32 bit :P) +15:31 < jtanx> well that would explain it +15:31 < sam_moore> Ok, it doesn't matter +15:31 < sam_moore> The stub function doesn't actually do anything with the value +15:31 < jtanx> cast int to int64 or whatever it is +15:32 < sam_moore> That would cause warnings on the BBB though? +15:32 < jtanx> only for the stub functions +15:32 < jtanx> and only for 64 bit +15:32 < jtanx> more ifdefs, yay +15:32 < sam_moore> ... +15:32 < jtanx> or we could get rid of the stubs +15:32 < sam_moore> I'm just going to ignore the warnings +15:32 < sam_moore> That could also work +15:32 < sam_moore> It doesn't really matter +15:32 < jtanx> and just do Wno-unsued-function or someting +15:32 < jtanx> yeah, oh well +15:35 < jtanx> One of the suggestions for the dilatometer was to just take a photo at the start and at the end +15:35 < jtanx> then do comparison +15:35 < sam_moore> Um, ok +15:35 < sam_moore> If they just want 2 data points +15:35 < jtanx> well +15:35 < jtanx> if we can find something other than opencv +15:36 < sam_moore> Ah +15:36 < sam_moore> How slow is it? +15:36 < jtanx> that may help, because right now opencv only plays nice with 352x288 or some other crap resolution +15:36 < jtanx> it's not that it's slow +15:36 < jtanx> is that it only works if the resolution is ~ 350 pixels x 2xx pixels +15:37 < jtanx> ffmpeg is fine with 640x480 afaik +15:37 < jtanx> it could probably do higher but haven't tested that +15:38 < sam_moore> http://libccv.org/ +15:38 < sam_moore> Maybe +15:39 < jtanx> or what if we framegrabbed with some external softare +15:39 < jtanx> then used opencv to process the saved image +15:39 < sam_moore> Yes, I was about to suggest that +15:39 < sam_moore> I'm assuming the problem with OpenCV is that it doesn't like taking images from cameras directly of that resolution +15:39 < sam_moore> And not some underlying problem with having large CvMats or something +15:40 < jtanx> no idea why +15:40 < jtanx> some obscure setting can probably fix it or something +15:40 < jtanx> but I'm not about to trawl though opencv documentaiton now +15:40 < sam_moore> Actually OpenCV works with my 640x480 webcam, so it's probably some low level arm specific problem +15:40 < sam_moore> Which would probably mean that other image processing libraries would also suck +15:40 < jtanx> it may be that too +15:41 < jtanx> I know that with ffmpeg it was spitting warnings at 640x480 +15:41 < jtanx> like non-monotonically increasing timestamp +15:41 < jtanx> and some other crap +15:41 < jtanx> I was running guvcview though +15:42 < jtanx> and it seemed to take 640x480 just fine +15:42 < jtanx> it was quite slow with x-forwarding and all, but at least it worked +15:44 < sam_moore> Hmm +15:44 < sam_moore> I would be inclined to say that taking a bunch of data points at low resolution is probably more useful than taking 2 data points at high resolution +15:45 < sam_moore> The best solution is to find some way of reading at the higher resolution though +15:46 < sam_moore> ... I'm worried about what Kieran is going to produce if he writes this dilatometer algorithm +15:46 < sam_moore> It's going to return an array isn't it... +15:46 < sam_moore> I have no idea why +15:47 < jtanx> :3 +15:47 < jtanx> brb ~5 mins while I relocate to a lecture theatre +15:47 < sam_moore> Ok +15:47 -!- jtanx [~asfa@130.95.248.194] has quit ["ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 24.0/20130910160258]"] +15:54 -!- jtanx [~asfa@130.95.248.194] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +16:13 < sam_moore> Ok, this is both terrible and awesome +16:13 < sam_moore> But I've written a test "sensor" that is essentially just an external program +16:17 < sam_moore> So... if anyone complains about not being able to use python... they can use python +16:17 < sam_moore> And they don't have to reinvent all of our FastCGI stuff +16:17 < sam_moore> Although apparently that's easy in python anyway +16:17 < sam_moore> It's the thought that counts +16:21 < jtanx> :P +16:21 < jtanx> flup +16:30 < jtanx> http://zacharyvoase.com/2009/09/08/sendfile/ +16:30 < jtanx> this could be interesting +16:31 < jtanx> replace static with our fastcgi app +16:31 < jtanx> http://wiki.nginx.org/XSendfile +17:00 -!- jtanx [~asfa@130.95.248.194] has quit [Ping timeout] +17:52 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +18:07 < jtanx> mmm feature creep +18:08 < sam_moore> Meh, it was better than dealing with that switch statement +18:09 < jtanx> yeah +18:09 < sam_moore> Also it made it really easy to decide where to put mutexes +18:10 -!- MctxBot [~twang@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit [Ping timeout] +18:10 < sam_moore> Given that I would have had to write a "strain.c" and do about the same amount of work anyway, I think the solution is a good one +18:10 < jtanx> it kind o makes sense though +18:11 < jtanx> you can't particularly generalise that much to each sensor type +18:11 < jtanx> so it makes sense to separate out based on what type of sensor it is +18:11 < sam_moore> Yes +18:11 < sam_moore> The Piped sensor is definitely feature creep though :P +18:12 < jtanx> ^-^ +18:12 < sam_moore> Although... +18:13 < sam_moore> If we wanted to distribute the sensors with a "master slave" system +18:13 < sam_moore> The code would end up looking alot like that +18:13 < sam_moore> Except with a network socket instead of a unix domain socket +18:14 < sam_moore> Also I'm not sure why I called it piped given that it doesn't use a pipe +18:14 < sam_moore> I suppose it sounds cooler than "uds" +18:20 < jtanx> So with electronics +18:20 < jtanx> the reason why they were having issues with getting the psu approved +18:20 < jtanx> was because they wanted to cut the leads and solder directly to the board +18:21 < jtanx> Oliver suggested that they use extension connectors +18:21 < jtanx> and cut the lead on the extension +18:21 < jtanx> but why they didn't think of that first, I don't know +18:37 -!- MctxBot [~twang@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +18:45 < jtanx> now to watch this week's lecture... +21:31 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit ["ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 24.0/20130910160258]"] +--- Day changed Thu Oct 10 2013 +08:11 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +09:40 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit ["ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 24.0/20130910160258]"] +13:30 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +23:04 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit ["ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 24.0/20130910160258]"] +--- Day changed Fri Oct 11 2013 +08:21 -!- Rowan [~Rowan@130.95.129.225] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +08:42 -!- Rowan [~Rowan@130.95.129.225] has quit [EOF From client] +09:19 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +09:59 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit ["ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 24.0/20130910160258]"] +15:09 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +15:10 < jtanx> urgh +15:10 < jtanx> burning the midnight oil trying to get my cits2232 project done +15:10 < jtanx> but +15:10 < jtanx> it has taught me a lot about django +15:10 < jtanx> which may be of use, especially for the whole admin stuff +15:11 < jtanx> one possibility is that we have two separate 'logins' +15:11 < jtanx> one gains you access to the site +15:11 < jtanx> one gains control over the bbb (eg the server api) +15:12 < jtanx> what you could do is keep the 'bind' functionality for the api, but make it check against the django user database for credentials +15:12 < jtanx> I'll look into it, if not today then probably tomorrow +19:39 < sam_moore> That sounds good +19:48 < sam_moore> Should we do something like this: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8988855/include-another-html-file-in-a-html-file (The accepted answer) to do with our sidebar/menu stuff +19:48 < sam_moore> Although... +19:48 < jtanx> well +19:48 < jtanx> if we use django it has really cool templating stuff +19:48 < sam_moore> That solution is actually about as much as just copy/pasting the sidebar at the moment +19:48 < jtanx> yeah +19:49 < sam_moore> So Django does parts of our GUI as well as the user management system? +19:49 < jtanx> Well yeah +19:49 < jtanx> so django would be ui mostly +19:49 < jtanx> then tack on to that our api +19:49 < jtanx> which remains exactly the same +19:49 < jtanx> except that it uses the django database for checking authorizaiton +19:50 < jtanx> so right before you commence an experiment, you try to 'gain control' of the bbb, you resupply your login creds +19:50 < sam_moore> Sure, that's a good solution, I thought django would just do user management though (rather than replace the JavaScript GUI) +19:50 < jtanx> well if you do use django +19:50 < jtanx> it's a good idea to change some of it, because of the templating system +19:51 < jtanx> and that it can conditionally show content +19:51 < sam_moore> Ok +19:51 < jtanx> some of the javascript stuff will stay though, definitely +19:51 < jtanx> especially all the live update stuff +19:51 < jtanx> but this is getting ahead of myself, because i'm not even sure if this will work +19:51 < sam_moore> Hahaha +19:52 < sam_moore> You're entering a territory where I can't help much +19:52 < jtanx> yeah, well all of this 'web development' is new area for me too :P +19:52 < jtanx> I'm supposed to be majoring in computation, not web tech... +19:52 < sam_moore> You know more/better jQuery than me +19:52 < jtanx> jquery is pretty easy to learn though +19:53 < jtanx> i picked it up completely from this project +19:53 < sam_moore> Well, that's one reason why we went with it, since I used it briefly for something and it wasn't too hard, and James said he'd used it before too +19:54 < jtanx> Yeah +19:54 < sam_moore> If you want to replace stuff with django, I'm ok with that, if it's simpler +19:55 < jtanx> I'll see how it goes, hopefully it shouldn't be too hard to setup +19:55 < sam_moore> It just seems silly to copy/paste this Navigation Menu into every file +19:55 < jtanx> yep +19:55 < sam_moore> But copy/pasting the code (stack overflow) to automatically make it is also annoying +19:55 < jtanx> We can roll with the jquery soln if I don't get this working +19:56 < sam_moore> Unless you could include that in the "runBeforeLoad()" ? +19:56 < jtanx> can't you just have a placeholder +19:56 < jtanx> and on document load, you load it? +19:56 < sam_moore> Yeah +19:56 < jtanx> It'll look a bit crap because you'll see it before the sidebar loads +19:56 < sam_moore> Actually that's how you're doing other things +19:56 < jtanx> yeah +19:56 < sam_moore> But the navigation menu is hard coded html +19:56 < sam_moore> I'm just reading the existing code :P +19:56 < jtanx> haha +19:57 < jtanx> yeah it's hardcoded - it's the easiest solution +19:57 < jtanx> I've got my case study for 2402 this/next week too +19:57 < sam_moore> Um... I think it's fairly easy to call load from a file +19:57 < sam_moore> I'll look into that +19:57 < jtanx> ok +19:58 < sam_moore> The case study was reasonable, although he wanted a lot more detail from us +19:58 < jtanx> what did you do? +19:58 < sam_moore> Despite struggling to cram it into 4 pages +19:58 < sam_moore> The pencil +19:58 < sam_moore> That's a good one +19:58 < jtanx> ah +19:58 < sam_moore> Lots of youtube videos +19:58 < jtanx> we're doing pet bottles +19:58 < jtanx> there's this megafactories one on the coke plant which was prettyc ool +19:58 < jtanx> but yeah the pencil one also has a lot +19:58 < jtanx> i think i saw the how its made one +19:59 < jtanx> Ha +19:59 < jtanx> http://wiki.nginx.org/HttpSsiModule +19:59 < jtanx> if you want to get server specific +19:59 < jtanx> you can do ssi +19:59 < jtanx> let's not do that if possible :P +20:00 < sam_moore> Wait... +20:00 < sam_moore> It looks like you put html comments and they get sent to the server? +20:00 < sam_moore> How is that a thing? +20:00 < jtanx> +20:00 < jtanx> nah what happens +20:00 < jtanx> is the server reads the html file +20:00 < jtanx> and where there's special placeholders +20:00 < jtanx> it does stuff +20:00 < sam_moore> Ah +20:01 < sam_moore> No, do it client side +20:01 < jtanx> yeah +20:01 < sam_moore> There's like jQuery.load +20:01 < sam_moore> I'd probably keep django for user auth to start with +20:01 < sam_moore> But I think jQuery should be sufficient for the GUI +20:02 < jtanx> I think if you roll with django +20:02 < jtanx> you should use jQuery for all the interactive stuff +20:02 < jtanx> (which you'd have to anyway) +20:02 < jtanx> but you should use the templating system that django's got +20:03 < sam_moore> Ok, what does django give you exactly then, I'm not quite sure what the "template" stuff is, I assume it's nothing like a C++ template +20:03 < jtanx> OK +20:03 < jtanx> hmm +20:03 < jtanx> I'll give you access to my cits2232 repo temporarily +20:03 < jtanx> so you can see +20:03 < sam_moore> If it lets you easily include bits of html that's cool, but jQuery looks to be able to do that easily as well +20:03 < sam_moore> Alright +20:04 < jtanx> actually you know what +20:04 < jtanx> i'll just post it on pastebin or something +20:05 < jtanx> http://privatepaste.com/ec22ba7238 +20:05 < jtanx> That's the base template +20:05 < jtanx> http://privatepaste.com/07499e4a19 +20:05 < jtanx> That's the index +20:05 < jtanx> {{variable_name}} will display a variable name +20:05 < jtanx> sorry, the contents of that variable +20:06 < jtanx> {% %} blocks are for control +20:06 < sam_moore> Hmm +20:07 < jtanx> the base template got a bit out of hand for that project +20:07 < sam_moore> Well, if you want to use something like that I'm ok with it +20:07 < sam_moore> Although I think the thing that I was originally complaining about can be solved in jQuery :P +20:08 < jtanx> yeah +20:08 < sam_moore> But you should probably ask everyone else involved with the GUI for input too +20:08 < jtanx> Yeah, good point +20:09 < sam_moore> ... Really I didn't want to be involved with the GUI, but I kind of need to mess around with at least some basic graph stuff to work out if I need to change the server sensors/actuators api +20:09 < jtanx> well let's just say that i did not envision doing the gui either +20:09 < sam_moore> I'll try and keep what I do consistent with the overall style though +20:09 < sam_moore> Which is how I got sidetracked complaining about copy/pasting things :P +20:10 < sam_moore> I think the GUI we have so far is pretty good +20:10 < jtanx> hehehe +20:10 < jtanx> yeah it's not too bad +20:11 < jtanx> the only thing that I wouldn't know how to do is that admin stuff +20:11 < sam_moore> user admin or experiment admin? +20:11 < jtanx> um +20:11 < jtanx> I dunno, whatever that 'admin' functionality needs to be +20:11 < jtanx> like 'access the full logs' +20:11 < sam_moore> Oh, right +20:12 < jtanx> unless you start implementing permissions in the api +20:12 < sam_moore> Hmm, we might have to +20:13 < sam_moore> It should just be an enum for the user type that gets returned/set by the authentication handler and checked for certain operations +20:13 < sam_moore> But as you mentioned the other day, you don't want someone to be able to login after someone else has started an experiment and cancel it +20:13 < sam_moore> Actually +20:13 < sam_moore> Do you? +20:13 < jtanx> admin only? +20:13 < sam_moore> Exactly +20:14 < jtanx> how difficult is that to do though +20:14 < sam_moore> Store the username of who owns the current experiment +20:14 < sam_moore> Store an enum of the user type of whoever is currently logged in +20:14 < sam_moore> If someone tries to stop the experiment, unless their username matches, or they are an admin, refuse +20:14 < sam_moore> There could be a safety issue there? +20:15 < jtanx> the only thing is +20:15 < sam_moore> If someone needs to stop the experiment but isn't an admin? +20:15 < jtanx> everything's based off the control key +20:15 < sam_moore> Meh... add another cookie +20:15 < sam_moore> ... That escalated quickly +20:15 < jtanx> you've already used the nameless cookie +20:15 < jtanx> if you add another cookie +20:15 < jtanx> you have to do string parsing +20:15 < jtanx> and have named cookies +20:16 < sam_moore> Hmmm +20:16 < sam_moore> "Beyond the scope of the project" ? +20:16 < jtanx> i think the format was +20:16 < jtanx> key=value; key=value2 +20:16 < jtanx> yeah, beyond the scope :P +20:16 < sam_moore> Yeah, that is ever so annoying +20:16 < jtanx> let's leave it for now +20:16 < jtanx> come back to it +20:16 < sam_moore> Because if it were something like "key=value&key=value2" you could potentially reuse the FCGI parser +20:17 < jtanx> yeah +20:17 < jtanx> you could modify it +20:17 < sam_moore> That would be the way to go +20:17 < jtanx> generalise it +20:17 < sam_moore> But it's low priority now +20:17 < jtanx> yep +20:17 < jtanx> wow i'm getting seriously sidetracked +20:18 < jtanx> this mechatronics project is more interesting than any of my other projects though +20:18 < sam_moore> Haha +20:19 < sam_moore> I know what you mean +20:19 < sam_moore> I want to compile a RT linux kernel on my laptop (since they have x86 versions) +20:19 < sam_moore> So that I can look at how much the consistency in sample rate could theoretically improve... +20:20 < sam_moore> If someone managed to port the RT linux kernel to the BeagleBone +20:20 < jtanx> RT linux on your computer +20:20 < jtanx> isn't that generally bad +20:20 < jtanx> because RT screws up other stuff +20:21 < sam_moore> Like what? +20:21 < jtanx> decreased performance to meet the deadlines +20:21 < sam_moore> Also, I don't have to permanently replace my existing kernel, just add another bootloader entry +20:22 < sam_moore> If it screws up nginx that would be annoying though +20:23 < jtanx> while you're at it, try running the bfs scheduler instead of the cfs scheduler :P +20:23 < sam_moore> Maybe +20:42 < sam_moore> Ok, the solution to the copy/paste is just something like $("#sidebar").load("static/sidebar.html") +20:42 < sam_moore> However, whilst running this in the document.ready function on a test page works, running it in index.html appears to have no effect +20:43 < sam_moore> Oh +20:43 < sam_moore> I know why +20:43 < sam_moore> Because runBeforeLoad is failing +20:43 < sam_moore> Presumably you still want to load content like the navigation bar even if the server isn't running +20:44 < sam_moore> So... there is ".done()" and ".fail()" ... is there ".either()"? +20:46 < sam_moore> Ahahaha +20:47 < sam_moore> Of course, there is ".always()" +20:49 < sam_moore> Hmm, I wouldn't want to design any sort of large system with a language like this, but it is an interesting style +20:51 < jtanx> haha +20:52 < sam_moore> So, a lot of the header stuff can be moved into .html files and just jQuery.loaded, which should make things cleaner +20:52 < sam_moore> I will refrain from doing that now though +20:53 < jtanx> don't be too tempted to do a lot of templating with javascript +20:53 < jtanx> because it will load asynchronously, stuff will look weird +20:53 < jtanx> and if the js breaks +20:53 < jtanx> well, your page is more screwed than before +20:54 < sam_moore> Ok... but you could still potentially have at least one html file in the static directory +20:54 < sam_moore> With all the header and navigation stuff +20:55 < sam_moore> Just have a .fail() function! +20:55 < sam_moore> That's what it's for, right :P +20:56 < sam_moore> $("#thing").load("static/thing.html").fail($("#thing").html("

Something fucked up

") +20:56 < sam_moore> Oh dear +20:58 < jtanx> ~.~ +20:58 < jtanx> django here: https://mctx.us.to:8043/databases +20:58 < jtanx> login with testuser:testuser +20:58 < jtanx> ignore that it looks a lot like our gui +20:58 < jtanx> except it doesnt work anymore +21:00 < sam_moore> Well, django's used for UCC for member administration +21:01 < sam_moore> Except it's entirely seperate from LDAP which we use for authentication +21:01 < sam_moore> Except it's not really because it binds to LDAP for authentication :S +21:01 < sam_moore> Wheels within wheels... +21:02 < jtanx> ookay +21:04 < sam_moore> You need LDAP for shell access +21:04 < sam_moore> In fact... +21:04 < sam_moore> We could potentially give pheme users shell access to the BeagleBone +21:04 < sam_moore> But there's not really any point +21:04 < jtanx> is that a good idea +21:05 < sam_moore> No +21:05 < sam_moore> It's an awful idea +21:05 < sam_moore> Just saying it's possible :P +21:06 < sam_moore> Someone could do this: :(){ :|:& };: +21:06 < sam_moore> And break the entire thing +21:08 < jtanx> is that the fork bomb +21:09 < jtanx> ok the site works now +21:09 < jtanx> sort of +21:10 < sam_moore> 400 Bad Request +21:10 < jtanx> hurr +21:10 < sam_moore> I think iceweasel is being dumb and ignoring https:// ? +21:10 < sam_moore> Although it was fine before +21:11 < jtanx> nah probably screwed up the nginx config +21:11 < sam_moore> No, it works, I just had to type the https:// instead of copy paste +21:11 < sam_moore> Wierd +21:11 < sam_moore> The test login doesn't work though +21:11 < jtanx> testuser doesn't work for some reason +21:11 < jtanx> yeah just register +21:12 < sam_moore> Will it actually send an email? +21:12 < jtanx> urgh +21:12 < jtanx> no +21:12 < sam_moore> haha +21:12 < jtanx> okay no the config is still broken +21:16 < sam_moore> I'll have to come back to this tomorrow +21:16 < sam_moore> Bye +21:17 < jtanx> ok bye +23:09 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit ["ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 24.0/20130910160258]"] +--- Day changed Sat Oct 12 2013 +10:20 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +13:49 -!- jtanx_ [~asfa@124-169-73-222.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +13:49 -!- MctxBot_ [~twang@124-169-73-222.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +14:03 -!- jtanx [~asfa@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit [Ping timeout] +14:05 -!- MctxBot [~twang@106-68-47-96.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit [Ping timeout] +14:34 -!- MctxBot [~twang@220-253-133-241.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +14:39 -!- jtanx [~asfa@220-253-133-241.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +14:46 -!- jtanx_ [~asfa@124-169-73-222.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit [Ping timeout] +14:47 -!- MctxBot_ [~twang@124-169-73-222.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit [Ping timeout] +--- Log closed Sat Oct 12 17:39:23 2013 +--- Log opened Sat Oct 12 22:41:38 2013 +22:41 -!- matches [matches@motsugo.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +22:41 -!- Irssi: #mctxuwa_softdev: Total of 2 nicks [0 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 2 normal] +22:41 -!- Irssi: Join to #mctxuwa_softdev was synced in 2 secs +22:41 -!- You're now known as sam_moore +--- Day changed Sun Oct 13 2013 +08:30 -!- jtanx [~asfa@220-253-133-241.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +10:18 < jtanx> yeah, about the django stuff, I'm not sure if we should do that now +10:18 < jtanx> two options I considered: +10:19 < jtanx> if you kept the 'bind' module, but added a method to authenticate against the django database, that could work, but it's a lot of effort +10:19 < jtanx> - there's two ways - one is to manually do it via interaction with the sqlite database and parsing the user string etc etc +10:20 < jtanx> the other way is to call the python function from c +10:20 < jtanx> I explored the 'call python from c' option and it does work, but it's quite cumbersome +10:20 < jtanx> I didn't bother exploring the 'manual interaction with sqlite' because that would be even more cumbersome +10:21 < jtanx> The other way, which I got working quite easily +10:21 < jtanx> is to protect one of the modules with nginx +10:21 < jtanx> say /api/control now becomes an 'internal' only module +10:21 < jtanx> so it's not usually accessible from outside +10:22 < jtanx> with django, say you got the address /databases/control +10:23 < jtanx> it can send back a request with header 'X-Accel-Redirect' to /api/control +10:23 < jtanx> Because it was sent by django, which is an internal application, it works +10:23 < jtanx> such that /databases/control looks like /api/control to the user +10:24 < jtanx> the problem with this setup is that then your api becomes entirely dependent on django to work +10:24 < jtanx> I guess you could replace 'django' with any other authrorization frontend +10:31 < jtanx> let's just stick with what we've got +10:36 < jtanx> hahahaha and that x-accel-redirect just crashed my server after I held down f5 +10:36 -!- MctxBot [~twang@220-253-133-241.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit [Connection reset by peer] +10:39 -!- MctxBot [~twang@220-253-133-241.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #mctxuwa_softdev +19:19 < jtanx> I think I'll try to get in early tomorrow to work on whatever needs to be done +19:56 < jtanx> For the actuators, do you really want it to crash (Fatal) if the user supplies a step say of 0,1,40000,2? +21:19 < jtanx> working on the graphs now +23:29 < jtanx> ookay +23:29 < jtanx> too tired to check, but I refactored it and I think it still works +23:30 < jtanx> I'll just leave it in my fork for now +23:30 -!- jtanx [~asfa@220-253-133-241.dyn.iinet.net.au] has quit ["bye"]