From: C R Onjob Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 17:00:03 +0000 (+0800) Subject: Automatic commit of irc logs X-Git-Url: https://git.ucc.asn.au/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=89ccf5e0395455ed799e8ea807e3cccc6d7a7518;p=ipdf%2Fdocuments.git Automatic commit of irc logs You'll wish that you had done some of the hard things when they were easier to do. --- diff --git a/irc/#ipdf.log b/irc/#ipdf.log index 8c96306..c28fd7f 100644 --- a/irc/#ipdf.log +++ b/irc/#ipdf.log @@ -955,3 +955,26 @@ 22:37 <@matches> "But be careful with division, because it will throw exceptions if it's like 1/3, then it will be Non-terminating decimal expansion." 22:37 <@matches> That sounds horrifying 22:40 -!- mode/#ipdf [-o matches] by matches +--- Day changed Sat May 03 2014 +22:01 < sulix> My crazy idea to you would be to research p-adic number representations. +22:01 < sulix> It's been a while, but they were mentioned a couple of times in pure maths units and seemed interesting/crazy and I can't remember much about them. +22:28 -!- mode/#ipdf [+o matches] by OperServ +22:29 <@matches> I will look at them, the "just use a float but with more bits until you run out of memory" doesn't seem a very well thought out approach +22:29 <@matches> Maybe someone actually cares enough to research better ways +22:29 <@matches> I mean, something's wrong with an idea when you can write "1/3" and have a runtime exception (re: Java BigNumber) +22:30 <@matches> I plan to write some nasty things about Java based on Kahan's rants so as to gloss over the fact that it has BigNumber built into it and forstall the inevitable "Why didn't you use Java!" +22:31 < sulix> I think we want to truncate to whatever the most accurate you can see at the given zoom level. +22:31 <@matches> Yeah +22:32 <@matches> It annoys me that XML and HTML specs don't have a PDF version +22:32 < sulix> I've been printing to pdf for some of those things. +22:33 <@matches> None of the links to different sections would work though +22:35 <@matches> Specifications are thrilling +22:35 <@matches> "How to read this specification" +22:35 <@matches> "This specification should be read like all other specifications" +22:35 <@matches> Oh wait +22:35 <@matches> It actually gets better +22:35 <@matches> Is that... +22:35 <@matches> Humour! +22:36 <@matches> I thought that wasn't allowed! +22:36 <@matches> "First it should be read cover-to-cover, multiple times. Then, it should be read backwards at least once. Then it should be read by picking random sections from the contents list and following all the cross references" +22:37 <@matches> As much as I love the idea of reading 626 pages of specification backwards...